Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix CI/RTD failures #3317

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 25, 2024
Merged

Fix CI/RTD failures #3317

merged 3 commits into from
Nov 25, 2024

Conversation

kecnry
Copy link
Member

@kecnry kecnry commented Nov 25, 2024

Description

This pull request fixes recent upstream changes causing CI/RTD build failures.

Change log entry

  • Is a change log needed? If yes, is it added to CHANGES.rst? If you want to avoid merge conflicts,
    list the proposed change log here for review and add to CHANGES.rst before merge. If no, maintainer
    should add a no-changelog-entry-needed label.

Checklist for package maintainer(s)

This checklist is meant to remind the package maintainer(s) who will review this pull request of some common things to look for. This list is not exhaustive.

  • Are two approvals required? Branch protection rule does not check for the second approval. If a second approval is not necessary, please apply the trivial label.
  • Do the proposed changes actually accomplish desired goals? Also manually run the affected example notebooks, if necessary.
  • Do the proposed changes follow the STScI Style Guides?
  • Are tests added/updated as required? If so, do they follow the STScI Style Guides?
  • Are docs added/updated as required? If so, do they follow the STScI Style Guides?
  • Did the CI pass? If not, are the failures related?
  • Is a milestone set? Set this to bugfix milestone if this is a bug fix and needs to be released ASAP; otherwise, set this to the next major release milestone. Bugfix milestone also needs an accompanying backport label.
  • After merge, any internal documentations need updating (e.g., JIRA, Innerspace)?

@kecnry kecnry added no-changelog-entry-needed changelog bot directive backport-v4.0.x on-merge: backport to v4.0.x labels Nov 25, 2024
@kecnry kecnry added this to the 4.0.1 milestone Nov 25, 2024
@kecnry kecnry marked this pull request as ready for review November 25, 2024 18:42
@kecnry kecnry added the trivial Only needs one approval instead of two label Nov 25, 2024
@rosteen
Copy link
Collaborator

rosteen commented Nov 25, 2024

Could you ignore the pkg_resources deprecation warning only for mpl_scatter_density? Just in case something else triggers it. NBD if it's too annoying to do.

@kecnry
Copy link
Member Author

kecnry commented Nov 25, 2024

not 100% sure on the syntax, let's see if this still passes 🤞

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 25, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.81%. Comparing base (6986593) to head (29c0b31).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #3317   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   88.81%   88.81%           
=======================================
  Files         125      125           
  Lines       19036    19036           
=======================================
  Hits        16906    16906           
  Misses       2130     2130           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@pllim pllim left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thanks!

@@ -138,6 +138,8 @@ filterwarnings = [
"ignore::DeprecationWarning:glue",
"ignore::DeprecationWarning:asteval",
"ignore:::specutils.spectra.spectrum1d",
# Remove the following line once https://github.com/astrofrog/mpl-scatter-density/issues/46 is addressed
"ignore:pkg_resources is deprecated as an API:DeprecationWarning:mpl_scatter_density",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@pllim pllim merged commit 33edc03 into spacetelescope:main Nov 25, 2024
19 checks passed
meeseeksmachine pushed a commit to meeseeksmachine/jdaviz that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2024
@kecnry kecnry deleted the fix-ci branch November 25, 2024 19:49
rosteen added a commit to rosteen/jdaviz that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2024
* Add intersphinx ref

* ignore mpl_scatter_density deprecation warning

* specify mpl_scatter_density only

---------

Co-authored-by: Ricky O'Steen <rosteen@stsci.edu>
kecnry added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 26, 2024
Co-authored-by: Kyle Conroy <kyleconroy@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport-v4.0.x on-merge: backport to v4.0.x no-changelog-entry-needed changelog bot directive trivial Only needs one approval instead of two
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants